人类学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (04): 481-492.

• 人类学学报 •    下一篇

关于北京猿人用火的证据:研究历史、争议与新进展

高星;张双权;张乐;陈福友   

  • 出版日期:2016-12-15 发布日期:2016-12-15

New evidences of in-situ using fire by the Peking Man at Zhoukoudian Locality 1: Research history, controversy and new development

GAO Xing, ZHANG Shuangquan, ZHANG Yue, CHEN Fuyou   

  • Online:2016-12-15 Published:2016-12-15

摘要: 周口店第1地点古人类用火证据是该遗址一系列重大科学发现中的一项重要内容,在很长时期内,作为同类遗存中最早的记录及其分析论证结果被国际学术界广泛接受。但随着少数西方学者的质疑和挑战,从上世纪八十年代中期开始在这一问题上出现争议,其后开展的埋藏学和地球化学分析又得出进一步否定的结论。但周口店遗址的洞穴地层十分复杂,目前残存的堆积与古人类生存时期的状态有重大差别,与当初大规模发掘时见证的遗物遗迹的分布与埋藏状况也有很大不同,在剖面表层做局部有限的采样分析并不足以推翻以前的系统性研究结论,何况很多否定性的意见源自学术理论思潮的转变和缺乏具体分析的常规性推理。从以前的发掘记录和各种分析结果看,周口店遗址埋藏着丰富的古人类用火证据,这些证据不是孤立的,是可以相互验证和支持的。2009年以来在遗址开展的新的发掘与研究获得重要进展,揭示出具有结构的火塘、烧骨、石灰化的灰岩块等原地用火产生的遗物与遗迹,对相关材料的现代科技分析进一步确定这些遗存的人类用火性质。这样,遗址上文化层的用火证据变得明确无误,相关争议终可尘埃落定。对于下部地层中的用火证据,尚需做同样的发掘、分析和研究工作。

关键词: 周口店;北京猿人;用火证据;考古发掘;地化分析

Abstract: Evidences for “controlled use of fire” by the Peking Man(Homo erectus pekinensis) from Zhoukoudian (ZKD) Locality 1 is one of the most important discoveries at the site during its early excavations. It was widely accepted for a long period of time that ZKD provided the earliest such record in human evolutionary history. However, since the mid-1980s, this notion has been repeatedly challenged and early evidences were questioned. Following limited taphonomic and geochemical studies that were conducted in the 1990s debates over controlled use of fire at ZKD locality 1 increased given their negative conclusions. ZKD is a very complicated site with intricate cave deposits, the remaining Western Section may hardly represent its original structure and taphonomic condition of the cave occupied by the Peking Man in the Middle Pleistocene, and contemporary researchers may never have the same opportunity with investigators who worked at the site in the 1920s-1930s so as to observe first-handed remains and features fresh and intact left by the Peking Man in various horizons. Thus, result of limited sampling and analysis on the surface of extant section can hardly refute the conclusions reached in the past which was based on a series of systematic investigations. In particular, some faults of negations in debates were largely based on hypothetical and speculative assumptions stemming from a theoretical shift concerning conceptions of early hominin subsistence capabilities, including hunting big game and using fire. A thorough review of original ZKD field notes, excavation reports and research papers leads to the conclusion that the unearthed fossil and cultural materials and traces of fire-use activities in certain horizons at the site are abundant, unambiguous and adequately supportive. A new set of field investigations and laboratory analyses initiated at the site in 2009 have yielded new and solid evidences to support the early establishment of in situ use of fire by the Peking Man. Our current knowledge indicates that Layer 4 at ZKD Locality 1 contains unambiguous evidences for in situ use of fire, including hearth structures. Future excavation and research conducted on the lower horizons may likely reveal similar evidence.

Key words: Zhoukoudian; Homo erectus pekinensis; fire-use evidence; excavation; geochemical analysis