人类学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 354-369.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0011cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0011

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

述评典型阿舍利遗址的石器技术及其蕴含的古人类行为

李浩1,2(), 雷蕾3, 李大伟4, 张萌5   

  1. 1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    2.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    3.贵州大学历史与民族文化学院,贵阳 550025
    4.广西民族大学科技史与科技文化研究院,南宁 530006
    5.复旦大学文物与博物馆学系,科技考古研究院,上海 200433
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-13 修回日期:2020-11-20 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-13
  • 作者简介:李浩,副研究员,主要从事旧石器与地质考古研究。E-mail: lihao@ivpp.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDB26000000);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA19050102);中国科学院百人计划

A review of lithic technology and implied human behaviors from some typical Acheulean sites

LI Hao1,2(), LEI Lei3, LI Dawei4, ZHANG Meng5   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    3. College of History and Ethnic Culture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025
    4. Institute for History and Culture of Science & Technology, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning 530006
    5. Department of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Institute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433
  • Received:2020-03-13 Revised:2020-11-20 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-13

摘要:

近年来,有关中国含手斧石器工业的研究取得了一系列进展,但是,在更深层次的人群社会行为研究方面的相关工作较为薄弱。本文以肯尼亚Olorgesailie遗址、以色列Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov遗址和英国Boxgrove等典型遗址为例,对国外不同地区、不同阶段阿舍利遗址中有关古人类社会行为的研究案例进行介绍和评述。通过这些述评,一方面促进我们对手斧人群社会行为的深入理解和认识,另一方面,也为推动国内相关研究工作的开展提供有益的启示和借鉴。

关键词: 阿舍利手斧, 技术策略, 环境适应, 社会行为, 文化演进

Abstract:

New research in recent years has obtained a series of achievements on our understanding of technological characteristics of the Acheulean Techno-complex in China. However, few studies in the region have focused on deep-seated issues regarding hominid social behaviors. In this paper, we present a review of social behavioral studies in three well-known Acheulean sites (i.e., Olorgesailie in Kenya, Gesher Benot Ya’aqov in Israel and Boxgrove in England) outside of China. We suggest that the technological strategies or material cultures can be thought as important reflections or expressions of invisible social behaviors, the latter consisting of an essential aspect in understanding the mechanisms and processes of human cultural evolution in the Stone Age. Therefore, in addition to investigating the archaeological records, social behavioral information that implied in these records will also need to be carefully unveiled, through which we can contribute to a better explanation of “the muddle in the middle” in human evolution.

Key words: Acheulean hand axes, Technological strategy, Environmental adaptation, Social behavior, Cultural evolution

中图分类号: