人类学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (05): 896-911.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0054cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0054

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

山西大同恒源路墓地人类颅骨的形态变异

侯侃1,2(), 李树云3, 徐楠4, 李君1   

  1. 1 山西大学考古文博学院, 太原 030006
    2 科技考古山西省重点实验室, 太原 030006
    3 大同市考古研究所, 大同 037048
    4 殷墟博物馆, 安阳 455000
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-26 修回日期:2025-02-27 出版日期:2026-10-15 发布日期:2026-10-16
  • 作者简介:侯侃,副教授,主要从事人类骨骼考古学研究。E-mail: houkan@live.cn
  • 基金资助:
    大同北魏时期出土人骨的生物考古学研究(21-4-15-1400-107);国家社会科学基金青年项目——“山西朔州马邑汉墓群出土人骨研究”(20CKG022)

Morphology variability of human crania from the Hengyuan Road Cemetery, Datong of Shanxi

HOU Kan1,2(), LI Shuyun3, XU Nan4, LI Jun1   

  1. 1 School of Archaeology and Museology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006
    2 Shanxi Key Laboratory of Archaeology Sciences, Taiyuan 030006
    3 Datong Institute of Archaeology, Datong 037048
    4 Yinxu Museum, Anyang 455000
  • Received:2024-11-26 Revised:2025-02-27 Online:2026-10-15 Published:2026-10-16

摘要:

本文通过对山西大同恒源路北魏墓地出土的人类颅骨进行形态学分析,探讨了墓地内个体颅骨形态的变异性及欧罗巴人种因素的存在。首先,结合主成分分析和生物距离分析评估组内颅骨形态的变异度,结果显示男性个体的变异度较低,而女性的变异度相对较高,暗示其来源的多样性。其次,采用判别分析方法与Howells数据库中的世界各地人群进行对比,初步判定部分个体可能具有欧罗巴人种的特征。再次,进一步鉴定出M35、M13-2等个体具有欧罗巴人种因素,且两性中的这些个体分别与欧罗巴人种的地中海东支类型和中亚两河类型较为接近。最后,通过生物距离构建无根邻接树,判断这些具有欧罗巴因素的个体与中国代表性古代人群的关系,推测这些欧罗巴人种因素可能与当时的文化交流、战争移民以及胡人迁居有关。本文不仅为北魏时期平城居民来源提供了新的证据,还验证了多元统计分析及机器学习算法在人种鉴定中的有效性,并且讨论了人种鉴定的意义。

关键词: 北魏, 颅骨形态学, 欧罗巴人种, 生物距离研究

Abstract:

Cranial morphological variability and potential European ancestry factors in human skeletal remains from the Northern Wei Dynasty cemetery at Hengyuan Road were examined in this study. A total of 62 craniums were analyzed, focusing on 18 male and 22 female adult individuals. The research aimed to address methodological limitations in traditional cranial analysis by integrating multivariate statistics and machine learning algorithms, thereby reducing subjectivity in ancestry estimation. The study began with an assessment of within-group variability using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and biological distance analysis. Specifically, the mean pairwise Euclidean distance (dm) was calculated to quantify intra- and intergroup variation, revealing that male craniums exhibited significantly lower variability compared to females. This disparity suggests that females may have originated from more diverse genetic or geographic backgrounds, potentially linked to intermarriage or migration practices during the Northern Wei period.

To identify non-Mongoloid individuals, discriminant analysis was conducted using W. W. Howells’ global craniometric database. The results suggested the presence of Europoid traits in some individuals, particularly those resembling the Mediterranean East Type (e.g., M35) and the Central Asian-Two Rivers Type (e.g., M13-2), which are two branches of Europoid. Machine learning algorithms, including random forest (via Ancestrees) and linear discriminant analysis (via Fordisc 3.1), were employed to validate these findings. For instance, M13-2 exhibited a 77.73% probability of Northern / Central European ancestry using Ancestrees’ tournamentForest algorithm, while Fordisc classified M35 as closest to ancient Egyptian and Zalavar groups (probabilities: 34.9% and 31.2%, respectively). These results highlight the advantage of algorithmic approaches in mitigating observer bias inherent in traditional visual assessments.

Biological distance analysis using unrooted neighbor-joining trees further contextualized these individuals within broader Eurasian populations. M35 clustered closely with Mediterranean East Type groups (e.g., Alagou I and Shampula), historically associated with ancient Silk Road populations like the Cheshi and Yutian. Conversely, M13-2 aligned with Central Asian-Two Rivers Type groups (e.g., Jilintai and Zhaosu), suggesting ties to Wusun or Xiongnu-affiliated populations. Notably, the mixed ancestry observed in females like M8-1 and M38 may reflect the multicultural dynamics of Pingcheng (modern Datong), which served as a hub for trade, warfare, and religious exchange during the Northern Wei Dynasty.

The socio-political context of Pingcheng as a cosmopolitan center underpins these findings. Between the 4th and 6th centuries CE, the Northern Wei court relocated millions of people from conquered territories, including Central Asian, Xianbei, and Xiongnu groups. Additionally, the presence of Buddhist artifacts in the Hengyuan Road cemetery aligns with historical records of Sogdian and Persian monks contributing to religious dissemination, possibly introducing Europoid genetic lineages. This multicultural exchange is reflected in the coexistence of European and East Asian cranial traits within the burial population.

Finally, the study underscores the transformative potential of advanced statistical methods in bioarchaeology. By combining PCA, machine learning, and phylogenetic networks, this research provides a replicable framework for analyzing cranial variability and ancestry in fragmented or incomplete datasets. However, limitations such as missing data emphasize the need for cautious interpretation. This work not only enriches our understanding of population diversity in medieval China but also challenges historical narratives by demonstrating that Europoid individuals in the Yellow River Basin were likely isolated cases rather than large-scale migrants, consistent with Han Kangxin’s earlier conclusions. Ultimately, these findings illustrate how cultural assimilation and the Silk Road’s connectivity shaped the biological landscape of ancient Pingcheng, reaffirming the integrative power of Chinese civilization.

Key words: The Northern Wei Dynasty, cranial morphology, Europoid race, biological distance analysis

中图分类号: