人类学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (05): 816-835.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0072cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0072
刘驷统1,2(
), 刘博轩1,2, 金泽田3, 邓国栋3, 同号文1, 吴秀杰1(
)
收稿日期:2025-05-06
修回日期:2025-07-18
出版日期:2025-10-15
发布日期:2025-10-13
通讯作者:
吴秀杰,研究员,主要从事古人类学研究。E-mail: wuxiujie@ivpp.ac.cn
作者简介:刘驷统,博士研究生,研究方向为古人类学。E-mail: liusitong@ivpp.ac.cn
基金资助:
LIU Sitong1,2(
), LIU Boxuan1,2, JIN Zetian3, DENG Guodong3, TONG Haowen1, WU Xiujie1(
)
Received:2025-05-06
Revised:2025-07-18
Online:2025-10-15
Published:2025-10-13
摘要:
华龙洞遗址是中国中更新世晚期重要的古人类遗址,出土了大量哺乳动物化石。为探讨华龙洞遗址出土的动物群组成、古人类行为与埋藏学背景,本文选择该遗址2014~2024年发掘的316件哺乳动物距骨化石为研究材料,对其进行尺寸测量、形态特征鉴定及表面痕迹分析。结果显示:1)距骨化石以鹿科和牛科为主,其次为猪科、熊科及少量犀科、剑齿象科、马属、巨貘和猫科动物;2)埋藏学分析表明,距骨受风化、水流磨蚀等自然营力影响较小;3)表面痕迹分析显示,鹿科与牛科距骨存在人工切割和砍斫痕,表明华龙洞遗址古人类偏好狩猎大中型食草动物。本研究首次系统分析了距骨化石反映的华龙洞遗址哺乳动物群组成及古人类行为证据,为中更新世晚期东亚古人类生存策略和动物资源利用研究提供了参考资料。
中图分类号:
刘驷统, 刘博轩, 金泽田, 邓国栋, 同号文, 吴秀杰. 华龙洞遗址出土的哺乳动物距骨化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 816-835.
LIU Sitong, LIU Boxuan, JIN Zetian, DENG Guodong, TONG Haowen, WU Xiujie. Mammalian astragalus fossils excavated at Hualongdong site[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(05): 816-835.
图1 各属种动物的距骨测量项目 a-i分别示意牛科 (a)、鹿科 (b)、猪科 (c)、马科 (d)、貘科 (e)、犀科 (f)、剑齿象科 (g)、熊科 (h)和猫科 (i)的距骨/ a-i respectively represent the talus of Bovidae(a), Cervidae(b), Suidae(c), Equidae(d), Tapiridae(e), Rhinocerotidae(f), Stegodontidae(g), Ursidae(h) and Felidae(i).
Fig.1 Measurement items of the talus
| 属种Species | 地点Locality | Glm | GLl | Bd | Dl | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | ||||||
| 鹿科动物Cervidae | 华龙洞HLD site* | 24.9 | 57.8 | 35.4 | 63.2 | 19.4 | 37.3 | 19 | 35.9 | ||||
| 水鹿Rusa unicolor | 潼南V00865* | 48.6 | 50.9 | 52.6 | 54.3 | 34 | 36.2 | 28 | 28.3 | ||||
| 葛氏斑鹿Pseudaxis grayi | 周口店第1地点CKT Loc.1[ | - | 46 | 51 | 27 | 31 | - | ||||||
| 肿骨鹿Cervus (Euryceros) pachyosteus | 周口店第1地点C/C.600* | 64.3 | 71.1 | 46.5 | 39.3 | ||||||||
| 谢家集V08936.3-6* | 57.3 | 61.6 | - | 33.6 | |||||||||
| 梅花鹿Cervus nippon | 西太平洞V15070:4* | 38.8 | 42.7 | 26.5 | 22.9 | ||||||||
| 田园洞TYD site[ | - | 43 | 48 | 27 | 28 | - | |||||||
| 马鹿Cervus elaphus | 比利牛斯山Pyrenees[ | 37.7 | 55.1 | 39.5 | 59.8 | 26.4 | 39.7 | 22.4 | 32.9 | ||||
| 鬣羚[ | 穿山洞CSD site | 48 | 52 | 31 | - | ||||||||
| 现生Extant | 41 | 44 | 28 | - | |||||||||
表1 华龙洞鹿科动物距骨测量数据及与相关属种的比较
Tab.1 Dimensions of a Cervidae astragalus from HLD, compared with those of the related species (mm)
| 属种Species | 地点Locality | Glm | GLl | Bd | Dl | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | ||||||
| 鹿科动物Cervidae | 华龙洞HLD site* | 24.9 | 57.8 | 35.4 | 63.2 | 19.4 | 37.3 | 19 | 35.9 | ||||
| 水鹿Rusa unicolor | 潼南V00865* | 48.6 | 50.9 | 52.6 | 54.3 | 34 | 36.2 | 28 | 28.3 | ||||
| 葛氏斑鹿Pseudaxis grayi | 周口店第1地点CKT Loc.1[ | - | 46 | 51 | 27 | 31 | - | ||||||
| 肿骨鹿Cervus (Euryceros) pachyosteus | 周口店第1地点C/C.600* | 64.3 | 71.1 | 46.5 | 39.3 | ||||||||
| 谢家集V08936.3-6* | 57.3 | 61.6 | - | 33.6 | |||||||||
| 梅花鹿Cervus nippon | 西太平洞V15070:4* | 38.8 | 42.7 | 26.5 | 22.9 | ||||||||
| 田园洞TYD site[ | - | 43 | 48 | 27 | 28 | - | |||||||
| 马鹿Cervus elaphus | 比利牛斯山Pyrenees[ | 37.7 | 55.1 | 39.5 | 59.8 | 26.4 | 39.7 | 22.4 | 32.9 | ||||
| 鬣羚[ | 穿山洞CSD site | 48 | 52 | 31 | - | ||||||||
| 现生Extant | 41 | 44 | 28 | - | |||||||||
图3 华龙洞遗址出土的鹿科动物距骨 从上至下from top to bottom:标本Ce.1,尺寸较小的鹿科距骨a smaller astragal;标本Ce.77,尺寸较大的鹿科距骨a larger astragal;标本Ce.73:疑似中国大角鹿(未定种) Sinomegaceros sp. 从左至右from left to right:背侧视dorsal view,外侧视external view,腹侧视plantar view,内侧视medial view
Fig.3 Cervidae astragalus at Hualongdong site
图4 华龙洞遗址出土的牛科动物距骨 上top:标本Bo.13;下bottom:标本Bo.21。 从左至右from left to right:背侧视dorsal view,外侧视external view,内侧视medial view,腹侧视plantar view
Fig.4 Bovidae astragalus at Hualongdong site
| 属种Species | 地点Locality | Glm | GLl | Bd | Dl | Dm | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | |||||||
| 牛科动物Bovidae | 华龙洞HLD site* | 73.6 | 92.6 | 79 | 79 | 97 | 86.6 | 50.5 | 69.9 | 58.7 | 40.7 | 55.4 | 48.7 | 44.1 | 57.3 | 48.2 | |||||
| 原始牛Bos primigenius | 洪河遗址Honghe site[ | - | - | - | 79.1 | - | - | 50.5 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 隆化V23312.8* | 90.8 | 103.3 | 69.5 | 58.6 | 52.1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 水牛Bubalus bubalis | 凯巴拉洞穴 Kebarah Cave[ | - | 89 | 77 | 58 | 51 | - | - | |||||||||||||
表2 华龙洞牛科动物距骨测量数据及与相关属种的比较
Tab.2 Dimensions of Bovidae astragalus from HLD, compared with those of the related species (mm)
| 属种Species | 地点Locality | Glm | GLl | Bd | Dl | Dm | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 平均值Mean | |||||||
| 牛科动物Bovidae | 华龙洞HLD site* | 73.6 | 92.6 | 79 | 79 | 97 | 86.6 | 50.5 | 69.9 | 58.7 | 40.7 | 55.4 | 48.7 | 44.1 | 57.3 | 48.2 | |||||
| 原始牛Bos primigenius | 洪河遗址Honghe site[ | - | - | - | 79.1 | - | - | 50.5 | - | - | |||||||||||
| 隆化V23312.8* | 90.8 | 103.3 | 69.5 | 58.6 | 52.1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 水牛Bubalus bubalis | 凯巴拉洞穴 Kebarah Cave[ | - | 89 | 77 | 58 | 51 | - | - | |||||||||||||
图5 华龙洞遗址出土的野猪距骨 上top:标本Su.8;下bottom:标本Su.9。 从左至右from left to right:背侧视dorsal view,外侧视external view,腹侧视plantar view,内侧视medial view
Fig.5 Suidae astragalus at Hualongdong site
图6 华龙洞遗址出土的犀科动物距骨 从上至下from top to bottom:标本Rh3,标本Rh1,标本Rh.2。 从左至右from left to right:背侧视dorsal view,腹侧视plantar view,远端视distal views
Fig.6 Rhinocerotidae astragalus at Hualongdong site
| 属种Species | 地点Locality | Gh | Lmt | Gb | Bfd | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Maxlm | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | |||||||
| 犀科动物Rhinocerotidae | 华龙洞HLD site* | Rh.1 | 90.1 | 70.9 | 91.3 | 75.4 | ||||||||
| 华龙洞HLD site* | Rh.2 | 100.5 | 80 | 107.2 | 89.6 | |||||||||
| 华龙洞HLD site* | Rh.3 | 67.2 | 58.2 | 81.6 | 64.8 | |||||||||
| 印度犀Rhinoceros unicornis | 坎查纳布里Kanchanaburi[ | 91 | 92 | - | 96.5 | 98 | 92.9 | 97 | ||||||
| 现生Extant[ | 89 | 101 | - | 102.5 | 90.5 | 85 | 93 | |||||||
| 爪哇犀Rhinoceros sondaicus | 贡布Kampot[ | 78 | 85 | - | 78 | 91 | 75 | 88 | ||||||
| 现生Extant[ | 75 | 86.5 | - | 87.5 | 100 | 69 | 84.5 | |||||||
| 苏门答腊犀Dicerorhinus sumatrensis | 现生Extant[ | 64.5 | 77 | - | 67.5 | 87 | 53 | 67 | ||||||
| 梅氏犀Dicerorhinus mercki | 欧洲Europe[ | 88.5 | 105 | - | 80 | 102 | 74 | 93 | ||||||
表3 华龙洞犀科动物距骨测量数据及与相关属种的比较
Tab.3 Dimensions of a Rhinocerotidae astragalus from HLD, compared with those of the related species (mm)
| 属种Species | 地点Locality | Gh | Lmt | Gb | Bfd | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Maxlm | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | 最小值Min | 最大值Max | |||||||
| 犀科动物Rhinocerotidae | 华龙洞HLD site* | Rh.1 | 90.1 | 70.9 | 91.3 | 75.4 | ||||||||
| 华龙洞HLD site* | Rh.2 | 100.5 | 80 | 107.2 | 89.6 | |||||||||
| 华龙洞HLD site* | Rh.3 | 67.2 | 58.2 | 81.6 | 64.8 | |||||||||
| 印度犀Rhinoceros unicornis | 坎查纳布里Kanchanaburi[ | 91 | 92 | - | 96.5 | 98 | 92.9 | 97 | ||||||
| 现生Extant[ | 89 | 101 | - | 102.5 | 90.5 | 85 | 93 | |||||||
| 爪哇犀Rhinoceros sondaicus | 贡布Kampot[ | 78 | 85 | - | 78 | 91 | 75 | 88 | ||||||
| 现生Extant[ | 75 | 86.5 | - | 87.5 | 100 | 69 | 84.5 | |||||||
| 苏门答腊犀Dicerorhinus sumatrensis | 现生Extant[ | 64.5 | 77 | - | 67.5 | 87 | 53 | 67 | ||||||
| 梅氏犀Dicerorhinus mercki | 欧洲Europe[ | 88.5 | 105 | - | 80 | 102 | 74 | 93 | ||||||
图11 华龙洞遗址出土的熊科动物距骨 a-b:大熊猫Ailuropoda(标本号Ur.16);c-d:黑熊Ursus thibetanus(标本号Ur.15);e-f:棕熊Ursus arctos(标本号Ur.6)。 左left:背侧视dorsal view;右right:腹侧视plantar view
Fig.11 Ursidae astragalus at Hualongdong site
图12 华龙洞遗址出土距骨表面的痕迹 a.标本Bo.12的砍斫痕Chopping marks;b.标本Ce.51的刮切痕迹Cutting marks;c.标本Ce. 93的水流磨圆和浸染痕迹Marks and dyes derived from water abrasion;d.标本Ce.28的啮齿类啃咬痕迹Rodent gnawing marks;e.标本Ur.5的食肉类啃咬痕迹Carnivore tooth marks;f.标本Bo.22的食肉类齿坑pits made by Carnivore;g.标本Bo.78的植物根系腐蚀痕迹Corrosion by plant;h.标本Bo.63的风化痕迹weathering marks
Fig.12 The marks on the surface of astragalus
| 切割痕Cutting marks | 砍斫痕Chopping marks | 啮齿类动物齿痕Rodent gnawing marks | 食肉类动物齿痕Carnivore tooth marks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 个数Num | 出现率Rate* | 个数Num | 出现率Rate | 个数Num | 出现率Rate | 个数Num | 出现率Rate | ||||
| 鹿科动物Cervidae | 6 | 4.14% | 0 | 32 | 22.07% | 19 | 13.10% | ||||
| 牛科动物Bovidae | 2 | 3.70% | 1 | 1.85% | 6 | 11.11% | 3 | 5.56% | |||
| 李氏野猪Sus lydekkeri | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.33% | 2 | 16.67% | |||||
| 犀科动物Rhinocerotidae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33.33% | ||||||
| 黑熊Ursus thibetanus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25% | ||||||
表4 各类动物距骨表面生物改造痕迹统计表
Tab.4 Traces of biological modification on the surface of astragalus
| 切割痕Cutting marks | 砍斫痕Chopping marks | 啮齿类动物齿痕Rodent gnawing marks | 食肉类动物齿痕Carnivore tooth marks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 个数Num | 出现率Rate* | 个数Num | 出现率Rate | 个数Num | 出现率Rate | 个数Num | 出现率Rate | ||||
| 鹿科动物Cervidae | 6 | 4.14% | 0 | 32 | 22.07% | 19 | 13.10% | ||||
| 牛科动物Bovidae | 2 | 3.70% | 1 | 1.85% | 6 | 11.11% | 3 | 5.56% | |||
| 李氏野猪Sus lydekkeri | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.33% | 2 | 16.67% | |||||
| 犀科动物Rhinocerotidae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 33.33% | ||||||
| 黑熊Ursus thibetanus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 25% | ||||||
| [1] |
Wang M, Zhou Z. Low morphological disparity and decelerated rate of limb size evolution close to the origin of birds[J]. Nat Ecol Evol, 2023, 7: 1257-1266
doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02091-z pmid: 37277496 |
| [2] | Lewis OJ. The joints of the evolving foot. Part I. The ankle joint[J]. Journal of anatomy, 1980, 130(3): 527-543 |
| [3] |
Blanco MVF, Ezcurra MD, Bona P, et al. New embryological and palaeontological evidence sheds light on the evolution of the archosauromorph ankle[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 5150
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62033-8 pmid: 32198441 |
| [4] | Prothero DR, Foss SE(eds.).The Evolution of Artiodactyls[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007, 19-31 |
| [5] | Tsubamoto T. Estimating body mass from the astragalus in mammals[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 2014, 59(2): 259-265 |
| [6] | Gruwier BJ, Kovarovic K. Ecomorphology of the cervid calcaneus as a proxy for paleoenvironmental reconstruction[J]. Anat Rec (Hoboken), 2022, 305(9): 2207-2226 |
| [7] |
Fortin PT, Balazsy JE. Talus Fractures: Evaluation and Treatment[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2001, 9(2): 114-127
pmid: 11281635 |
| [8] | Saladié P, Fernández P, Rodríguez-Hidalgo A, et al. The TD 6.3 faunal assemblage of the Gran Dolina site (Atapuerca, Spain): A late Early Pleistocene hyena den[J]. Historical Biology, 2017, 29(7): 1-19 |
| [9] | Orbach M, Yeshurun R. The hunters or the hunters: Human and hyena prey choice divergence in the Late Pleistocene Levant[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, 160: 102572 |
| [10] | Lyman RL. Vertebrate Taphonomy[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 70-113 |
| [11] | Haruda AF. Separating Sheep (Ovis aries L.) and Goats (Capra hircus L.) Using Geometric Morphometric Methods: An Investigation of Astragalus Morphology from Late and Final Bronze Age Central Asian Contexts[J]. Int. J. Osteoarchaeology, 2017, 27: 551-562 |
| [12] | Darney T. Analysis of the talus or astragalus bone of select squirrels for taxonomic diagnosis[D]. MA thesis, State College: The Pennsylvania State University, 2013, 2-12 |
| [13] | Pierre O, Dziomber I, Manuela A, et al. The differentiated impacts and constraints of allometry, phylogeny, and environment on the ruminants' ankle bone[J]. Commun Biol, 2025, 8(456): 1-13 |
| [14] | Sambo R, Hanon R, Maringa N, et al. Ecomorphological analysis of bovid remains from the Plio-Pleistocene hominin-bearing deposit of Unit P at Kromdraai, South Africa[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2025, 61: 104871 |
| [15] | Hanon R, Fourvel JB, Sambo R, et al. New fossil Bovidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) from Kromdraai Unit P, South Africa and their implication for biochronology and hominin palaeoecology[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2024, 331: 108621 |
| [16] | Wendy DB, Nicolás EC, Benjamin PK. Climbing adaptations, locomotory disparity and ecological convergence in ancient stem ‘kangaroos'[J]. R. Soc. Open Sci, 2019, 6: 181617 |
| [17] | Tong HW, Zhang B, Chen X, et al. New fossils of small and medium-sized bovids from the Early Pleistocene Site of Shanshenmiaozui in Nihewan Basin, North China[J]. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 2022, 60(2): 134-168 |
| [18] | 张双权, 张乐, 栗静舒, 等. 晚更新世晚期中国古人类的广谱适应生存——动物考古学的证据[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(8): 1024-1036 |
| [19] | Wu XJ, Pei SW, Cai YJ, et al. Archaic human remains from Hualongdong, China, and Middle Pleistocene human continuity and variation[J]. PNAS, 2019, 116: 9820-9824 |
| [20] | Wu XJ, Pei SW, Cai YJ, et al. Morphological description and evolutionary significance of 300 ka hominin facial bones from Hualongdong, China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, 161: 103052 |
| [21] | Wu XJ, Pei SW, Cai YJ, et al. Morphological and morphometric analyses of a late Middle Pleistocene hominin mandible from Hualongdong, China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 182: 103411 |
| [22] | Xing S, Wu XJ, Liu W, et al. Middle Pleistocene human femoral diaphyses from Hualongdong, Anhui Province, China[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2021, 174: 285-298 |
| [23] | 宫希成, 郑龙亭, 邢松, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞出土的人类化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(4): 427-436 |
| [24] | 董哲, 战世佳. 安徽东至县华龙洞旧石器时代遗址出土石制品研究[J]. 东南文化, 2015, 6: 63-71 |
| [25] | 董哲, 裴树文, 盛锦朝, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞古人类遗址2014-2016年出土的石制品[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017, 37(4): 778-788 |
| [26] | 同号文, 吴秀杰, 董哲, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞古人类遗址哺乳动物化石的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(2): 284-305 |
| [27] | Jiangzuo QG, Werdelin L, Zhang K, et al. Prionailurus kurteni (Felidae, Carnivora), a new species of small felid from the late Middle Pleistocene fossil hominin locality of Hualongdong, southern China[J]. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 2024, 61(1): 35-342 |
| [28] | 裴树文, 蔡演军, 董哲, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞遗址洞穴演化与古人类活动[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 593-607 |
| [29] | 李潇丽, 董哲, 裴树文, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞洞穴发育与古人类生存环境[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2017, 37(3): 169-179 |
| [30] | 伊丽莎白·施密德. 动物骨骼图谱[M]. 译者:李天元. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1992, 84-85 |
| [31] | 西蒙·赫森. 哺乳动物骨骼和牙齿鉴定方法指南[M]. 译者:侯彦峰,马萧林. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012, 87-89 |
| [32] | 安格拉·冯登德里施. 考古遗址出土动物骨骼测量指南[M]. 译者:马萧林,侯彦峰. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007, 111-113 |
| [33] | Fisher JW. Bone surface modifications in zooarchaeology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1995, 2(1): 7-68 |
| [34] | Behrensmeyer AK. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering[J]. Paleobiology, 1978, 4(2): 150-162 |
| [35] | Gifford DP. Taphonomy and paleoecology: A critical review of Taphonomyand Paleoecology Archaeology's sister disciplines[J]. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 1981, 4: 365-438 |
| [36] | 张双权. 河南许昌灵井动物群的埋藏学研究[D]. 博士研究生毕业论文, 北京: 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 2009, 1-216 |
| [37] | Dominguez-Rodrigo M, de Juana S, Galan AB, et al. A new protocol to differentiate trampling marks from butchery cut marks[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2009, 36(12): 2643-2654 |
| [38] | 张双权. 旧石器遗址动物骨骼表面非人工痕迹研究及其考古学意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 131-140 |
| [39] | Binford LR. Bones: Ancient men and modern myth[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1981, 1-320 |
| [40] | Reitz EJ, Wing ES. Zooarchaeology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 1-455 |
| [41] | Villa P, Mahieu E. Breakage patterns of human long bones[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1991, 21(1): 27-48 |
| [42] | Capaldo SD, Blumenschine RJ. A quantitative diagnosis of notches made by hammer stone percussion and carnivore gnawing in bovid long bones[J]. American Antiquity, 1994, 59(4): 724-748 |
| [43] | Blumenschine RJ, Marean CW, Capaldo SD. Blind tests of interanalyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone. Marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1996, 23(4): 493-507 |
| [44] | Young CC. On the artiodactyla from the Sinanthropus site at Choukoutien[M]. Palaeontologia Sinica, Ser. C, 1932, 8(2): 1-100 |
| [45] | 同号文, 刘金毅, 张双权. 周口店田园洞大中型哺乳动物记述[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(3): 213-221 |
| [46] | Uzunidis A, Rufà A, Blasco R, et al. Speciated mechanism in Quaternary cervids (Cervus and Capreolus) on both sides of the Pyrenees: a multidisciplinary approach[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 20200 |
| [47] | 黄万波, 朱学稳, 王训一. 记桂林穿山洞发现的鬣羚和大熊猫化石[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1983, 21(2): 151-159+183-184 |
| [48] | 邹松林, 陈曦, 张贝, 等. 江西萍乡上栗县晚更新世哺乳动物化石发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(1): 109-120 |
| [49] | 王晓敏, 许春华, 同号文. 湖北郧西白龙洞古人类遗址的大额牛化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(3): 338-352 |
| [50] | Liang QY, Chen QJ, Zhang NF, et al. Subsistence strategies in the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age in Nenjiang River Basin: A zooarchaeological and stable isotope analysis of faunal remains at Honghe site, Northeast China[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2023, 33(2): 271-284 |
| [51] | Saxon EC. The mobile herding economy of Kebarah Cave, Mt Carmel: An economic analysis of the faunal remains[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1974, 1(1): 27-45 |
| [52] | Fujita M, Kawamura Y, Murase N. Middle Pleistocene wild boar remains from NT Cave, Niimi, Okayama Prefecture, west Japan[J]. Journal of Geosciences, Osaka City University, 2000, 43(4): 57-95 |
| [53] | Faure M, Guérin C. Le Sus scrofa (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Suidae) du gisement Pléistocène Supérieur de Jaurens, a Nespouls, Corrèze, France[J]. Nouvelles Archives du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon, fasc. 1983, 21: 45-63 |
| [54] | Filoux A, Suteethorn V. A late Pleistocene skeleton of Rhinoceros unicornis (Mammalia, Rhinocerotidae) from western part of Thailand (Kanchanaburi Province)[J]. Geobios, 2018, 51(1): 31-49 |
| [55] | Guérin C. Les rhinocéros (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du Miocène terminal au Pléistocène supérieur en Europe occidentale. Comparaison avec les espèces actuelles[M]. Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 1980, 79: 1-1185 |
| [56] | Beden M, Guérin C. Le gisement de vertébrés du Phnom Loang (province de Kampot, Cambodge): faune pléistocène moyen terminal (Loangien)[J]. Geography, 1973, 27: 1-97 |
| [57] | Tsoukala E, Guérin C. The Rhinocerotidae and Suidae of the middle pleistocene from petralona cave (Macedonia, Greece)[J]. Acta zool. bulg., 2016, 68(2): 243-264 |
| [58] | 周本雄, 刘后一. 青海共和更新世的哺乳动物化石[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1959, 4: 217-223 |
| [59] | 陈胜前, 罗虎. 安徽东至县华龙洞旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2012, 4: 7-13 |
| [60] | Shipman P, Rose J. Early hominid hunting, butchering, and carcass-processing behaviors: Approaches to the fossil record[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1983, 2(1): 57-98 |
| [61] |
Stiner MC, Gopher A, Barkai R. Hearth-side socioeconomics, hunting and paleoecology during the late Lower Paleolithic at Qesem Cave, Israel[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011, 60: 213-233
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.006 pmid: 21146194 |
| [62] | 尤悦. 新疆东黑沟遗址出土动物骨骼研究[D]. 博士研究生毕业论文, 北京: 中国社会科学院大学, 2012, 129-168 |
| [1] | 刘武, 吴秀杰. 华龙洞古人类化石及其在人类演化上的意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 727-741. |
| [2] | 蔡演军, 裴树文, 金泽田. 安徽东至华龙洞遗址沉积演化过程及其年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 742-753. |
| [3] | 金泽田, 吴秀杰, 邓国栋, 刘武. 华龙洞人6号头骨的面貌复原及其形态特点[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 754-764. |
| [4] | 裴树文, 董哲, 耿帅杰, 叶芷, 马东东, 张亚盟, 金泽田. 华龙洞遗址发现的石制品及人类行为[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 765-778. |
| [5] | 常美静, 李强, 倪喜军, 张玄, 同号文. 非飞行小哺乳动物化石反映的华龙洞人生存环境[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 799-815. |
| [6] | 江左其杲, 刘博轩, 刘驷统, 贺乐天, 同号文. 华龙洞1号地点的食肉目哺乳动物化石及其时代和古生态意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 836-849. |
| [7] | 史静耸, 胡海虔, 邓国栋, 金泽田. 安徽东至华龙洞1号地点中更新统蛇类化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 850-861. |
| [8] | 刘博轩, 刘驷统, 金泽田, 邓国栋, 吴秀杰. 从大额牛牙齿看华龙洞人的狩猎行为[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 862-873. |
| [9] | 郑明聪, 汪静怡, 严毅, 陈逸迎, 吴妍. 安徽华龙洞遗址大额牛的食性[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 895-905. |
| [10] | 唐思源, 刘驷统, 周凯, 饶慧芸, 吴秀杰, 付巧妹. 安徽东至华龙洞遗址动物化石蛋白质保存状况初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 917-926. |
| [11] | 姚艳燕, 黄胜敏, 廖卫, 李金燕, 张一景, 莫进尤, 王伟. 广西吹风洞早更新世动物群的埋藏学[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(03): 514-528. |
| [12] | 刘武. 二十一世纪中国人类演化研究的发现、认识与理论探索[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(06): 881-899. |
| [13] | 李欣, 姜帅, 黄婷, 钟华, 温有锋. 内蒙古与新疆达斡尔族头面部特征比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(04): 586-596. |
| [14] | 吴秀杰. 中更新世晚期许家窑人化石的研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 5-18. |
| [15] | 刘武, 吴秀杰. 中更新世晚期中国古人类化石的形态多样性及其演化意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(04): 563-575. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
京ICP证05002819号-3