宁夏鸽子山遗址第10地点出土动物骨骼的埋藏学初步观察

doi:10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0019

人类学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (02): 232-244.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0019cstr: 32091.14.j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0019

宁夏鸽子山遗址第10地点出土动物骨骼的埋藏学初步观察

张双权¹^,²^,³(), 彭菲¹^,², 张乐¹^,², 郭家龙⁴, 王惠民⁴, 黄超¹^,³, 戴静雯⁵, 张钰哲⁵, 高星¹^,²^,³

1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
2.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心, 北京 100044
3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
4.宁夏文物考古研究所, 银川 750001
5.吉林大学,长春 130012

收稿日期:2018-08-16 修回日期:2019-02-13 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2020-09-10
作者简介:张双权（1972-）,男,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所副研究员,主要从事埋藏学与旧石器时代动物考古学研究。E-mail: zhangshuangquan@ivpp.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(41672023);国家自然科学基金面上项目(41772025);国家文物局“ 宁夏鸽子山考古发掘” 项目;中国科学院古生物化石发掘与修理专项

Taphonomic observation of faunal remains from the Gezishan Locality 10 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

ZHANG Shuangquan¹^,²^,³(), PENG Fei¹^,², ZHANG Yue¹^,², GUO Jialong⁴, WANG Huimin⁴, HUANG Chao¹^,³, DAI Jingwen⁵, ZHANG Yuzhe⁵, GAO Xing¹^,²^,³

1. Laboratory for Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of CAS at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
4. Ningxia Institute of Archaeology and Cultural relics, Yinchuan 750001
5. Jilin University, Changchun 130012

Received:2018-08-16 Revised:2019-02-13 Online:2019-05-15 Published:2020-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

宁夏鸽子山遗址第10 地点（QG10）位于青铜峡市西北约20 km的贺兰山南麓。2014-2017年,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所与宁夏文物考古研究所联合组队对该遗址进行了发掘,出土大量动物化石、近万件石制品以及装饰品、骨制品、结构性火塘等。本项研究基于遗址第4层出土动物化石的埋藏学初步观察认为:晚更新世末期的古人类是遗址中动物骨骼的富集者和改造者;QG10的狩猎-采集人群采取狩猎而非主动食腐的方式获取了遗址附近的大中型食草类动物,并将其完整搬运至遗址内进行后续的肢解、食肉与敲骨取髓等营养性处理过程。相对于上述动物种类而言,遗址内的小型动物则是在其营养物质之外,古人类还利用了它们的骨骼材料以制作器型规整的骨角类工具。

关键词: 鸽子山遗址, 埋藏学, 动物考古学, 旧石器时代, 古人类行为适应

Abstract:

Located in the foothills of Helan Mountain, roughly 20 km to the northwest of Qingtongxia City, locality 10(QG10) of the Gezishan site was systematically excavated in 2014-2017. Along with thousands of lithic tools of microblade technology and dozens of perforated beads and bone artifacts, a large number of faunal remains was recovered from the site. Based on preliminary observations of taphonomic features of the animal bones identifiable to a specific taxon and/or skeletal element from the site, it could be argued that humans are the main agent responsible for the accumulation and modification of the faunal remains at QG10, and they procured the main prey animals through active hunting rather than aggressive scavenging. In addition, hunter-gatherers transported complete carcasses to the site to be processed, butchering the middle/large-sized animals and breaking open their bones mainly for nutritional purposes. However, it seems clear that in addition to their nutritional value, small animals at the site were probably exploited to manufacture bone artifacts as well.

Key words: Gezishan site, Taphonomy, Zooarchaeology, Paleolithic, Adaptive strategy

中图分类号:

K871.12

张双权, 彭菲, 张乐, 郭家龙, 王惠民, 黄超, 戴静雯, 张钰哲, 高星. 宁夏鸽子山遗址第10地点出土动物骨骼的埋藏学初步观察[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(02): 232-244.

ZHANG Shuangquan, PENG Fei, ZHANG Yue, GUO Jialong, WANG Huimin, HUANG Chao, DAI Jingwen, ZHANG Yuzhe, GAO Xing. Taphonomic observation of faunal remains from the Gezishan Locality 10 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(02): 232-244.

图/表 8

图1 宁夏鸽子山遗址第10 地点（QG10）的地理位置

Fig.1 Geographic location of the Gezishan site(QG10)

图2 QG10出土的各动物种属代表性标本 1. 兔右侧下颌 (right mandible , Lepus sp.）;2. 普氏原羚角 (horn corn, Procapra przewalskii);3. 狐左上M1 (left M1, Vulpes sp.);4. 鹿的上臼齿 (upper molar, Cervus sp.);5. 鸟类的股骨(femur, Aves);6. 马的右下颊齿(right lower molar, Equus przewalskyi)

Fig.2 Animal species from QG10

表1 鸽子山遗址出土各动物种属的数量统计

Tab.1 Counts of animal species from QG10

	鸟类 Aves	兔 Lepussp.	狐 Vulpessp.	普氏原羚 Procapra przewalskii	鹿类 Cervussp.	普氏野马 Equus przewalskyi	小计 Sum	牙齿碎片 Tooth fragments	总计 Total
NISP	4	103	30	74	150	279	640	89	729
MNI	2	6	1	2	2	7			20

图3 QG10出土动物骨骼风化级别

Fig.3 Weathering degrees of the animal bones from QG10

图4 QG10出土动物骨骼的表面改造痕迹（其中1、3、8的比例尺为1 mm,其他的为1 cm） 1. 图2 方框内部切割痕迹放大 (inset of no. 2, denotes details of cut marks);2. 具切割痕迹的标本 (cut marks);3. 图6 方框内部敲砸痕迹放大(inset of no.6, denotes details of percussion marks);4. 具食肉类啃咬痕迹的标本 (carnivore tooth marks);5. 具生物腐蚀痕迹的标本 (microbial bioerosion marks);6. 具敲砸痕迹的标本 (percussion marks);7. 具烧烤痕迹与切割痕迹的标本(bones bearing both cut marks and thermal alterations);8. 图7 方框内部切割痕迹放大 (inset of no. 7, denotes details of cut marks)

Fig.4 Surface modifications on animal bones from QG10

表2 切割痕迹在普氏野马和鹿类肢骨上的分布

Tab.2 Frequency of cut marks across bone elements

	上部肢骨 Upper limbs	中部肢骨 Middle limbs	下部肢骨 Lower limbs
鹿类Cervus sp.	6（66.67%）	1（11.11%）	2（22.22%）
普氏野马Equus przewalskyi	4（23.53%）	11（64.71%）	2（11.76%）

图5 QG10出土管状骨骨干周长保存状况

Fig.5 Circumferential ratios of the limb bones from QG10

图6 QG10出土动物的骨骼单元分布（%MAU）

Fig.6 Bone element abundance of the animal species from QG10（%MAU）

参考文献 69

[1]	彭菲, 郭家龙, 王惠民, 等. 宁夏鸽子山遗址再获重大发现[J]. 中国文物报, 2017 -02-10(第5版)
[2]	张乐, 王春雪, 张双权, 等. 切割痕迹揭示马鞍山遗址晚更新世末人类肉食行为[J]. 科学通报, 2009,54:2871-2878
[3]	Norton CJ, 张双权, 张乐, 等.上/更新世动物群中人类与食肉动物“印记”的识别[J]. 人类学学报, 2007,26:183-192
[4]	Lyman RL. Vertebrate Taphonomy[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 1-552
[5]	Norton CJ, Gao X. Hominin-carnivore interactions during the Chinese Early Paleolithic: Taphonomic perspectives from Xujiayao[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2008,55(1):164-178 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.02.006 URL pmid: 18387651
[6]	Blumenschine RJ, Marean CW, Capaldo SD. Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks, and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1996,23(4):493-507
[7]	Blumenschine RJ. Percussion marks, tooth marks, and experimental determinations of the timing of hominid and carnivore access to long bones at FLK Zinjanthropus, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 1995,29(1):21-51
[8]	Dominguez-Rodrigo M. Flesh availability and bone modifications in carcasses consumed by lions: Palaeoecological relevance in hominid foraging patterns[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1999,149(1-4):373-388
[9]	Dominguez-Rodrigo M, Barba R. New estimates of tooth mark and percussion mark frequencies at the FLK Zinj site: The carnivore-hominid-carnivore hypojournal falsified[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2006,50(2):170-194 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.09.005 URL pmid: 16413934
[10]	Zhang Y, Stiner MC, Dennell R, et al. Zooarchaeological perspectives on the Chinese Early and Late Paleolithic from the Ma’anshan site(Guizhou, South China)[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010,37(8):2066-2077
[11]	Stiner MC, Barkai R, Gopher A. Cooperative hunting and meat sharing 400-200 kya at Qesem Cave, Israel[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009,106(32):13207-13212 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900564106 URL pmid: 19666542
[12]	Fisher JW. Bone surface modifications in zooarchaeology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1995,2(1):7-68
[13]	Brain CK. The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981: 1-384
[14]	Capaldo SD, Blumenschine RJ. A quantitative diagnosis of notches made by hammerstone percussion and carnivore gnawing in bovid long bones[J]. American Antiquity, 1994,59(4):724-748
[15]	Bunn HT, Kroll EM, Ambrose SH, et al. Systematic Butchery by Plio/Pleistocene Hominids at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[and Comments and Reply][J]. Current Anthropology, 1986,27(5):431-452
[16]	Blumenschine RJ, Selvaggio MM. Percussion marks on bone surfaces as a new diagnostic of hominid behaviour[J]. Nature, 1988,333(6175):763-765
[17]	张双权. 旧石器遗址动物骨骼表面非人工痕迹研究及其考古学意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014,34:131-140
[18]	张双权, 李占扬, 张乐, 等. 河南灵井许昌人遗址动物骨骼表面人工改造痕迹[J]. 人类学学报, 2011,30:313-326
[19]	Haynes G. A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore limb bones[J]. Paleobiology, 1983: 164-172
[20]	Binford LR. Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myth[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1981: 1~ 320
[21]	Olsen SL, Shipman P. Surface modification on bone: Trampling versus butchery[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1988,15(5):535-553
[22]	Fiorillo AR. An introduction to the identification of trample marks[J]. Current Research in the Pleistocene, 1984,1:47-48
[23]	Behrensmeyer AK, Gordon KD, Yanagi GT. Nonhuman bone modification in Miocene fossils from Pakistan[A]. In: Bonnichsen R, Sorg M, eds. Bone Modification[C]. Orono: Center for the Study of the First Americans, 1989, 99-120
[24]	Hill A. Bone Modification by Modem Spotted Hyenas[A]. In: Bonnichsen R, Sorg MH, eds. Bone Modification[C]. Orono: University of Maine Center for the Study of the First Americans, 1989, 169-178
[25]	Nilssen PJ. An actualistic butchery study in South Africa and its implications for reconstructing hominid strategies of carcass acquisition and butchery in the Upper Pleistocene and Plio-Pleistocene[D]. Ph.D Dissertation. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, 2000
[26]	Behrensmeyer AK. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering[J]. Paleobiology, 1978,4(2):150-162
[27]	Selvaggio MM. Carnivore tooth marks and stone tool butchery marks on scavenged bones—archaeological implications[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 1994,27(1-3):215-228
[28]	Capaldo SD. Experimental determinations of carcass processing by Plio-Pleistocene hominids and carnivores at FLK 22(Zinjanthropus), Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 1997,33(5):555-597 doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0150 URL pmid: 9403079
[29]	Norton CJ, Gao X. Zhoukoudian Upper Cave revisited[J]. Current Anthropology, 2008,49(4):732-745
[30]	Parkinson JA, Plummer T, Hartstone-Rose A. Characterizing felid tooth marking and gross bone damage patterns using GIS image analysis: An experimental feeding study with large felids[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2015,80:114-134 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.011 URL pmid: 25467112
[31]	Faith JT. Sources of variation in carnivore tooth-mark frequencies in a modern spotted hyena(Crocuta crocuta) den assemblage, Amboseli Park, Kenya[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2007,34(10):1601-1609
[32]	Blumenschine RJ, Prassack KA, Kreger CD, et al. Carnivore tooth-marks, microbial bioerosion, and the invalidation of Dominguez-Rodrigo and Barba’s(2006) test of Oldowan hominin scavenging behavior[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 2007,53(4):420-426 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.01.011 URL pmid: 17727916
[33]	Dominguez-Rodrigo M. Meat-eating by early hominids at the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus site, Olduvai Gorge(Tanzania): An experimental approach using cut-mark data[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 1997,33(6):669-690 doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0161 URL pmid: 9467775
[34]	Lupo KD, O’Connell JF. Cut and tooth mark distributions on large animal bones: Ethnoarchaeological data from the Hadza and their implications for current ideas about early human carnivory[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2002,29(1):85-109
[35]	Zhang Y, Zhang SQ, Xu X, et al. Zooarchaeological perspective on the Broad Spectrum Revolution in the Pleistocene-Holocene transitional period, with evidence from Shuidonggou Locality 12, China[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2013,56(9):1487-1492
[36]	Zeder MA. The Broad Spectrum Revolution at 40: Resource diversity, intensification, and an alternative to optimal foraging explanations[J]. Journal Of Anthropological Archaeology, 2012,31(3):241-264
[37]	Prendergast ME, Yuan JR, Bar-Yosef O. Resource intensification in the Late Upper Paleolithic: A view from southern China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2009,36(4):1027-1037
[38]	Munro ND. Epipaleolithic subsistence intensification in the Southern Levant: The faunal evidence[A]. In: Hublin J-J, Richards MP, eds. Evolution of Hominin Diets: Integrating approaches to the study of palaeolithic subsistence, 2009, 141-155
[39]	Stiner MC. Thirty years on the “Broad Spectrum Revolution” and paleolithic demography[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001,98(13):6993-6996 doi: 10.1073/pnas.121176198 URL pmid: 11390968
[40]	Stiner MC, Munro ND, Surovell TA. The Tortoise and the Hare: Small-Game Use, the Broad-Spectrum Revolution, and Paleolithic Demography[J]. Current Anthropology, 2000,41(1):39-79 URL pmid: 10593724
[41]	Zhang Y, Wang CX, Zhang SQ, et al. A zooarchaeological study of bone assemblages from the Ma’anshan Paleolithic site[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2010,53(3):395-402
[42]	Zhang S, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. The broad-spectrum adaptations of hominins in the later period of Late Pleistocene of China—Perspectives from the zooarchaeological studies[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2016,59(8):1529-1539
[43]	Pickering TR, Egeland CP. Experimental patterns of hammerstone percussion damage on bones: Implications for inferences of carcass processing by humans[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2006,33(4):459-469
[44]	Bar-Oz G, Adler DS. Taphonomic History of the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Faunal Assemblage from Ortvale Klde , Georgian Republic[J]. Journal of Taphonomy, 2005,3(4):185-211
[45]	张双权. 河南许昌灵井动物群的埋藏学研究[D].博士学位论文. 北京: 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 2009
[46]	张乐. 马鞍山遗址古人类行为的动物考古学研究[D].博士学位论文. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2008
[47]	Shipman P, Foster G, Schoeninger M. Burnt bones and teeth: An experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1984,11(4):307-325
[48]	Stiner MC, Kuhn SL, Weiner S, et al. Differential Burning, Recrystallization, and Fragmentation of Archaeological Bone[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1995,22(2):223-237
[49]	Hanson M, Cain. CR. Examining histology to identify burned bone[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2007,34(11):1902-1913
[50]	Gifford-Gonzalez DP. Ethnographic analogues for interpreting modified bones: Some cases from East African[A]. In: Bonnichsen R, Sorg MH, eds. Bone Modification[C]. Orono: University of Maine Center for the Study of the First Americans, 1989, 179-246
[51]	Gifford DP. Taphonomy and paleoecology: A critical review of archaeology’s sister disciplines[A]. In: Schiffer MB, ed. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory[C]. New York and London: Academic Press, 1981, 365-438
[52]	Johnson E. Current developments in bone technology[A]. In: Schiffer MB, ed. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory[C]. New York and London: Academic Press, 1985, 157-235.
[53]	Bunn HT. Comparative analysis of modern bone assemblages from a San hunter-gatherer camp in the Kalahari Desert, Botswana, and from a spotted hyena den near Nairobi, Kenya[A]. In: Clutton-Brock J, Grigson C, eds. Animals and Archaeology: 1 Hunters and Their Prey [C]. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports(International Series), 1983, 143-148
[54]	Villa P, Mahieu E. Breakage patterns of human long bones[J]. Journal Of Human Evolution, 1991,21(1):27-48
[55]	Bunn HT, III. Meat-eating and human evolution: Studies on the diet and subsistence patterns of Plio-Pleistocene hominids in East Africa[D]. Ph.D Dissertation. California: University of California, 1982
[56]	Binford LR. Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1978: 1-509
[57]	Bartram LE. Perspectives on skeletal part profiles and utility curves from eastern Kalahari ethnoarchaeology[A]. In: Hudson J, ed. From bones to behavior: Ethnoarchaeological and experimental contributions to the interpretation of faunal remains[C]. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations at Southern Illinois University, 1993, 115-137
[58]	Bartram LE. Perspectives on skeletal part profiles and utility curves from Eastern Kalahari ethnoarchaeology[A]. In: Hudson J, ed. From Bones to Behavior: Ethnoarchaeological and Experimental Contributions to the Interpretations of Faunal Remains[C]. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993, 115-137
[59]	Bunn HT, Bartram LE, Kroll EM. Variability in bone assemblage formation from Hadza hunting, scavenging, and carcass processing[J]. Journal Of Anthropological Archaeology, 1988,7(4):412-457
[60]	White TE. Observations on the butchering technique of some aboriginal people(1)[J]. American Antiquity, 1952,17(3):337— 338
[61]	Metcalfe D, Jones KT. A reconsideration of animal body-part utility indices[J]. American Antiquity, 1988,53(3):486-504
[62]	Grayson DK. Quantitative Zooarchaeology: Topics in the Analysis of Archaeological Faunas[M]. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 1984
[63]	Lyman RL. Quantitative Paleozoology[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008
[64]	Lam YM, Chen Xb, Pearson OM. Intertaxonomic varibility in patterns of bone density and the differential representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid elements in the Archaeological record[J]. American Antiquity, 1999,64(2):343-362
[65]	Klein RG, Cruz-Uribe K. The Analysis of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984
[66]	Klein RG, Wolf C, Freeman LG, et al. The use of dental crown heights for constructing age profiles of red deer and similar species in archaeological samples[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1981,8(1):1-31
[67]	Hillson S. Teeth[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005
[68]	Levine MA. Archaeo-Zoological Analysis of Some Upper Pleistocene Horse Bone Assemblages in Western Europe[D]. Ph.D dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 1979
[69]	Spinage CA. Age estimation of zebra[J]. East African Wildlife Journal, 1972,10:273-277

宁夏鸽子山遗址第10地点出土动物骨骼的埋藏学初步观察

Taphonomic observation of faunal remains from the Gezishan Locality 10 in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

在线阅读

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 69

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	Evgeny P RYBIN, Arina M KHATSENOVICH. 旧石器时代晚期初段色楞格河人类的扩散路线[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 780-796.
[2]	高黄文, 刘颖杰, 陆成秋, 孙雪峰, 黄旭初, 徐静玥. 湖北郧阳包包岭遗址2021年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 828-838.
[3]	肖培源, 阮齐军, 高玉, 贾真秀, 张明, 杨李靖, 刘建辉, 李三灵, 李浩. 2022年云南宾川盆地旧石器遗址调查报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 448-457.
[4]	Hiroyuki SATO, Kazuki MORISAKI. 日本旧石器晚期石器技术起源的新考古学与人类学证据[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(03): 470-487.
[5]	王华, 李占扬, Thijs van KOLFSCHOTEN. 德国西宁根与中国灵井的骨器比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 214-232.
[6]	赵清坡, 马欢欢. 河南灵宝旧石器考古调查报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 321-330.
[7]	许竞文, 浣发祥, 杨石霞. 旧石器时代考古中出土的赭石及相关遗物的研究方法[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(02): 331-343.
[8]	高星, 张月书, 李锋, 陈福友, 王晓敏, 仪明洁. 泥河湾盆地东谷坨遗址2016-2019年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 106-121.
[9]	赵云啸, 仝广, 涂华, 赵海龙. 河北省泥河湾盆地石沟遗址C区发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 122-131.
[10]	周士航, 何湘栋, 徐静玥, 李潇丽, 牛东伟. 蔚县盆地东沟遗址2017年度发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 132-142.
[11]	张振, 王莹, 李月丛. 泥河湾盆地旧石器时代人类活动与环境关系的研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 184-198.
[12]	周振宇, 王法岗, 关莹. 河北泥河湾盆地西白马营遗址1985-1986年出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 55-66.
[13]	仝广, 李锋, 赵海龙, 闫晓蒙, 高星. 泥河湾盆地火山角砾岩原料的热处理实验[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 81-90.
[14]	王晓敏, 刘连强, 陈国鹏, 李锋, 谢飞, 高星. 泥河湾盆地马圈沟遗址哺乳动物破碎长骨反映的古人类行为[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(01): 91-105.
[15]	加藤真二. 旧石器时代晚期人类在欧亚东部地区的扩散和文化传播[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(06): 842-856.