人类学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (05): 871-883.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0085cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0085
收稿日期:2025-02-21
修回日期:2025-06-20
出版日期:2026-10-15
发布日期:2026-10-16
通讯作者:
张全超,博士,教授,主要从事人类骨骼考古学研究。E-mail:py2000sdqy@sina.com
作者简介:孙晓璠,助理研究员,主要从事人类骨骼考古学研究。E-mail: sunxiaofan@nankai.edu.cn
基金资助:
SUN Xiaofan1,2(
), LIU Yan3, ZHANG Quanchao2(
)
Received:2025-02-21
Revised:2025-06-20
Online:2026-10-15
Published:2026-10-16
摘要:
本文对山西盂县温池墓地明清居民肢骨的肌肉起止点和形态变化进行了观察、测量和统计,比较了男女两性的活动差异,以及缠足与未缠足女性之间的差异。结果表明:1)性别和年龄是影响起止点改变最重要的因素,而体型和女性缠足习俗对起止点改变和肢骨形态影响较小;2)整体上,男性、年长者和体型较大个体的起止点发育程度更高,肢骨粗壮度更强;3)人群存在性别分工,女性更多从事依赖上肢重复性活动的生产活动,男性的日常生产以上肢活动为主,但对下肢的负重需求也较高;4)无论缠足与否,女性均需要参与家庭生产活动。综合推测,男性可能在农闲时从事煤炭开采、驮煤贩运和冶铁工作,女性均需参与家庭生产中的纺织工作。
中图分类号:
孙晓璠, 刘岩, 张全超. 山西盂县温池墓地居民肢骨的肌肉起止点与形态变化[J]. 人类学学报, 2026, 45(05): 871-883.
SUN Xiaofan, LIU Yan, ZHANG Quanchao. Entheseal changes and limb bone morphological variation of the population from the Wenchi Cemetery in Yu County, Shanxi[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(05): 871-883.
| 观察项目Items | 性别Sex | 年龄Age | 是否缠足Footbinding | 身高Stature | 体质量Body mass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | |||||
| 肱三头肌起点Triceps brachii | 1.521 | 0.000 | 0.063 | 0.161 | 0.583 | 0.685 | -0.003 | 0.721 | 0.022 | 0.625 | ||||
| 肋锁韧带附着点Costoclavicular ligament | 1.120 | 0.004 | 0.209 | 0.452 | -0.583 | 0.297 | 0.002 | 0.650 | 0.021 | 0.648 | ||||
| 锥状韧带附着点Conoid ligament | -0.666 | 0.244 | -0.753 | 0.130 | 0.333 | 0.348 | 0.002 | 0.766 | 0.057 | 0.349 | ||||
| 斜方韧带附着点Trapezoid ligament | 0.016 | 0.671 | -0.283 | 0.284 | 0.417 | 0.704 | 0.001 | 0.833 | 0.025 | 0.601 | ||||
| 胸大肌起点Pectoralis major (clavicle) | 0.290 | 0.116 | -0.401 | 0.311 | -1.083 | 0.740 | -0.002 | 0.825 | -0.025 | 0.776 | ||||
| 三角肌起点Deltoideus | -0.198 | 0.548 | -0.591 | 0.029 | -1.111 | 0.297 | 0.004 | 0.565 | -0.022 | 0.677 | ||||
| 胸大肌止点Pectoralis major (humerus) | 0.166 | 0.072 | -0.597 | 0.018 | 0.150 | 0.982 | 0.001 | 0.732 | 0.037 | 0.308 | ||||
| 大圆肌和背阔肌止点Latissimus dorsi/teres major | 0.163 | 0.005 | -0.813 | 0.028 | 0.383 | 0.989 | 0.003 | 0.514 | 0.105 | 0.009 | ||||
| 三角肌止点Deltoideus (humerus) | 0.021 | 0.130 | -1.023 | 0.000 | 0.056 | 0.618 | -0.011 | 0.065 | -0.050 | 0.336 | ||||
| 肱桡肌止点Brachioradialis | -0.075 | 0.162 | -0.981 | 0.019 | -0.350 | 0.123 | 0.009 | 0.144 | 0.182 | 0.001 | ||||
| 肱二头肌止点Biceps brachii | 0.583 | 0.001 | -1.231 | 0.000 | 0.333 | 0.554 | 0.001 | 0.819 | 0.028 | 0.534 | ||||
| 旋前圆肌止点Pronator teres | 0.202 | 0.023 | -1.157 | 0.007 | 0.111 | 0.771 | 0.002 | 0.678 | 0.059 | 0.279 | ||||
| 骨间膜Interosseous membrane | 0.411 | 0.080 | -0.952 | 0.001 | 0.278 | 0.633 | 0.006 | 0.343 | 0.101 | 0.073 | ||||
| 肱三头肌止点Triceps brachii (ulna) | 0.346 | 0.095 | -0.445 | 0.214 | -0.100 | 0.307 | 0.007 | 0.212 | 0.074 | 0.203 | ||||
| 肱肌止点Brachialis | -0.036 | 0.698 | -0.173 | 0.285 | 1.000 | 0.450 | 0.005 | 0.348 | 0.076 | 0.128 | ||||
| 旋后肌起点Supinator | 0.192 | 0.190 | -0.269 | 0.387 | 0.617 | 0.752 | -0.001 | 0.876 | 0.027 | 0.552 | ||||
| 臀大肌止点Gluteus maximus | -0.250 | 0.986 | -1.167 | 0.000 | 0.433 | 0.792 | 0.000 | 0.995 | 0.048 | 0.381 | ||||
| 股内侧肌起点Vastus medialis | 0.437 | 0.003 | -0.278 | 0.666 | -0.433 | 0.136 | 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.135 | 0.002 | ||||
| 髂腰肌止点Iliopsoas | 0.612 | 0.002 | -0.555 | 0.006 | -0.361 | 0.220 | 0.003 | 0.462 | 0.020 | 0.573 | ||||
| 髌骨股四头肌止点Quadriceps tendon (patella) | -0.778 | 0.539 | -1.750 | 0.003 | 1.286 | 0.271 | 0.007 | 0.367 | 0.092 | 0.283 | ||||
| 胫骨股四头肌止点Quadriceps tendon (tibia) | 1.510 | 0.000 | 0.105 | 0.884 | 0.367 | 0.903 | 0.016 | 0.001 | 0.102 | 0.024 | ||||
| 比目鱼肌起点Soleus | 1.228 | 0.000 | -0.338 | 0.290 | 0.583 | 0.891 | 0.009 | 0.093 | 0.084 | 0.061 | ||||
| 跟腱止点Achilles tendon | 2.143 | 0.000 | 0.036 | 0.297 | 0.417 | 0.380 | -0.009 | 0.278 | -0.047 | 0.631 | ||||
表1 温池明清居民起止点改变的广义线性模型统计结果
Tab.1 GLM results for entheseal changes of Wenchi population in the Ming and Qing dynasties
| 观察项目Items | 性别Sex | 年龄Age | 是否缠足Footbinding | 身高Stature | 体质量Body mass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | |||||
| 肱三头肌起点Triceps brachii | 1.521 | 0.000 | 0.063 | 0.161 | 0.583 | 0.685 | -0.003 | 0.721 | 0.022 | 0.625 | ||||
| 肋锁韧带附着点Costoclavicular ligament | 1.120 | 0.004 | 0.209 | 0.452 | -0.583 | 0.297 | 0.002 | 0.650 | 0.021 | 0.648 | ||||
| 锥状韧带附着点Conoid ligament | -0.666 | 0.244 | -0.753 | 0.130 | 0.333 | 0.348 | 0.002 | 0.766 | 0.057 | 0.349 | ||||
| 斜方韧带附着点Trapezoid ligament | 0.016 | 0.671 | -0.283 | 0.284 | 0.417 | 0.704 | 0.001 | 0.833 | 0.025 | 0.601 | ||||
| 胸大肌起点Pectoralis major (clavicle) | 0.290 | 0.116 | -0.401 | 0.311 | -1.083 | 0.740 | -0.002 | 0.825 | -0.025 | 0.776 | ||||
| 三角肌起点Deltoideus | -0.198 | 0.548 | -0.591 | 0.029 | -1.111 | 0.297 | 0.004 | 0.565 | -0.022 | 0.677 | ||||
| 胸大肌止点Pectoralis major (humerus) | 0.166 | 0.072 | -0.597 | 0.018 | 0.150 | 0.982 | 0.001 | 0.732 | 0.037 | 0.308 | ||||
| 大圆肌和背阔肌止点Latissimus dorsi/teres major | 0.163 | 0.005 | -0.813 | 0.028 | 0.383 | 0.989 | 0.003 | 0.514 | 0.105 | 0.009 | ||||
| 三角肌止点Deltoideus (humerus) | 0.021 | 0.130 | -1.023 | 0.000 | 0.056 | 0.618 | -0.011 | 0.065 | -0.050 | 0.336 | ||||
| 肱桡肌止点Brachioradialis | -0.075 | 0.162 | -0.981 | 0.019 | -0.350 | 0.123 | 0.009 | 0.144 | 0.182 | 0.001 | ||||
| 肱二头肌止点Biceps brachii | 0.583 | 0.001 | -1.231 | 0.000 | 0.333 | 0.554 | 0.001 | 0.819 | 0.028 | 0.534 | ||||
| 旋前圆肌止点Pronator teres | 0.202 | 0.023 | -1.157 | 0.007 | 0.111 | 0.771 | 0.002 | 0.678 | 0.059 | 0.279 | ||||
| 骨间膜Interosseous membrane | 0.411 | 0.080 | -0.952 | 0.001 | 0.278 | 0.633 | 0.006 | 0.343 | 0.101 | 0.073 | ||||
| 肱三头肌止点Triceps brachii (ulna) | 0.346 | 0.095 | -0.445 | 0.214 | -0.100 | 0.307 | 0.007 | 0.212 | 0.074 | 0.203 | ||||
| 肱肌止点Brachialis | -0.036 | 0.698 | -0.173 | 0.285 | 1.000 | 0.450 | 0.005 | 0.348 | 0.076 | 0.128 | ||||
| 旋后肌起点Supinator | 0.192 | 0.190 | -0.269 | 0.387 | 0.617 | 0.752 | -0.001 | 0.876 | 0.027 | 0.552 | ||||
| 臀大肌止点Gluteus maximus | -0.250 | 0.986 | -1.167 | 0.000 | 0.433 | 0.792 | 0.000 | 0.995 | 0.048 | 0.381 | ||||
| 股内侧肌起点Vastus medialis | 0.437 | 0.003 | -0.278 | 0.666 | -0.433 | 0.136 | 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.135 | 0.002 | ||||
| 髂腰肌止点Iliopsoas | 0.612 | 0.002 | -0.555 | 0.006 | -0.361 | 0.220 | 0.003 | 0.462 | 0.020 | 0.573 | ||||
| 髌骨股四头肌止点Quadriceps tendon (patella) | -0.778 | 0.539 | -1.750 | 0.003 | 1.286 | 0.271 | 0.007 | 0.367 | 0.092 | 0.283 | ||||
| 胫骨股四头肌止点Quadriceps tendon (tibia) | 1.510 | 0.000 | 0.105 | 0.884 | 0.367 | 0.903 | 0.016 | 0.001 | 0.102 | 0.024 | ||||
| 比目鱼肌起点Soleus | 1.228 | 0.000 | -0.338 | 0.290 | 0.583 | 0.891 | 0.009 | 0.093 | 0.084 | 0.061 | ||||
| 跟腱止点Achilles tendon | 2.143 | 0.000 | 0.036 | 0.297 | 0.417 | 0.380 | -0.009 | 0.278 | -0.047 | 0.631 | ||||
| 解释变量 Explanatory variables | 纤维型起止点Fibrous entheses(n=10) | 纤维软骨型起止点Fibrocartilaginous entheses(n=13) | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 数量quantity(n) | 占比percentage | 数量quantity(n) | 占比percentage | |||
| 性别Sex | 5 | 50.00% | 5 | 38.46% | 0.685 | |
| 年龄Age | 4 | 40.00% | 7 | 53.85% | 0.680 | |
| 身高Stature | 1 | 10.00% | 1 | 7.69% | 0.455 | |
| 体质量Body mass | 2 | 20.00% | 2 | 15.38% | 1.000 | |
表2 温池明清居民纤维型起止点与纤维软骨型起止点的显著受影响程度比较
Tab.2 Comparison of the significant impact between FE and FCE of Wenchi population in the Ming and Qing dynasties
| 解释变量 Explanatory variables | 纤维型起止点Fibrous entheses(n=10) | 纤维软骨型起止点Fibrocartilaginous entheses(n=13) | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 数量quantity(n) | 占比percentage | 数量quantity(n) | 占比percentage | |||
| 性别Sex | 5 | 50.00% | 5 | 38.46% | 0.685 | |
| 年龄Age | 4 | 40.00% | 7 | 53.85% | 0.680 | |
| 身高Stature | 1 | 10.00% | 1 | 7.69% | 0.455 | |
| 体质量Body mass | 2 | 20.00% | 2 | 15.38% | 1.000 | |
| 观察项目Items | 性别Sex | 年龄Age | 是否缠足Footbinding | 身高Stature | 体质量Body mass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | |||||
| 肩部Shoulder | 0.064 | 0.091 | -0.586 | 0.004 | 0.043 | 0.896 | 0.002 | 0.481 | 0.033 | 0.271 | ||||
| 肘部Elbow | 0.361 | 0.005 | -0.650 | 0.000 | 0.378 | 0.672 | 0.004 | 0.257 | 0.083 | 0.020 | ||||
| 前臂Forearm | 0.305 | 0.026 | 0.706 | 0.011 | 0.267 | 0.814 | 0.003 | 0.469 | 0.067 | 0.120 | ||||
| 髋部Hip | 0.168 | 0.097 | -0.899 | 0.000 | 0.350 | 0.921 | 0.003 | 0.505 | 0.058 | 0.163 | ||||
| 膝部Knee | 0.626 | 0.000 | -0.358 | 0.324 | 0.360 | 0.649 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.114 | 0.000 | ||||
| 足部Foot | 1.179 | 0.000 | -0.471 | 0.190 | 0.708 | 0.394 | 0.008 | 0.081 | 0.053 | 0.141 | ||||
表3 温池明清居民功能复合体的广义线性模型统计结果
Tab.3 GLM results for functional complex of Wenchi population in the Ming and Qing dynasties
| 观察项目Items | 性别Sex | 年龄Age | 是否缠足Footbinding | 身高Stature | 体质量Body mass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | |||||
| 肩部Shoulder | 0.064 | 0.091 | -0.586 | 0.004 | 0.043 | 0.896 | 0.002 | 0.481 | 0.033 | 0.271 | ||||
| 肘部Elbow | 0.361 | 0.005 | -0.650 | 0.000 | 0.378 | 0.672 | 0.004 | 0.257 | 0.083 | 0.020 | ||||
| 前臂Forearm | 0.305 | 0.026 | 0.706 | 0.011 | 0.267 | 0.814 | 0.003 | 0.469 | 0.067 | 0.120 | ||||
| 髋部Hip | 0.168 | 0.097 | -0.899 | 0.000 | 0.350 | 0.921 | 0.003 | 0.505 | 0.058 | 0.163 | ||||
| 膝部Knee | 0.626 | 0.000 | -0.358 | 0.324 | 0.360 | 0.649 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.114 | 0.000 | ||||
| 足部Foot | 1.179 | 0.000 | -0.471 | 0.190 | 0.708 | 0.394 | 0.008 | 0.081 | 0.053 | 0.141 | ||||
| 观察项目Items | 性别Sex | 年龄Age | 是否缠足Footbinding | 身高Stature | 体质量Body mass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | |||||
| 肱骨粗壮指数Caliber index of the humerus | 0.928 | 0.021 | -0.067 | 0.523 | 1.998 | 0.185 | -0.007 | 0.437 | 0.000 | 0.253 | ||||
| 肱骨骨干断面指数Shaft index of the humerus | 2.255 | 0.148 | 2.591 | 0.102 | -2.940 | 0.136 | 0.016 | 0.638 | 0.000 | 0.429 | ||||
| 股骨粗壮指数Robusticity index of the femur | 0.169 | 0.023 | -0.351 | 0.369 | 0.459 | 0.263 | -0.005 | 0.202 | 0.000 | 0.168 | ||||
| 股骨嵴指数Pilastric index of the femur | 15.281 | 0.000 | 3.707 | 0.859 | 10.299 | 0.024 | 0.045 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.625 | ||||
| 扁平指数Platycnemic index of the femur | 2.999 | 0.005 | -0.245 | 0.810 | 2.026 | 0.924 | -0.002 | 0.918 | 0.000 | 0.970 | ||||
| 胫骨中部断面指数Midshaft index of the tibia | -3.057 | 0.140 | -3.002 | 0.152 | -5.084 | 0.462 | 0.048 | 0.137 | 0.000 | 0.300 | ||||
表4 温池明清居民肢骨线性测量指数的广义线性模型统计结果
Tab.4 GLM results for limb diaphyseal shape of Wenchi population in the Ming and Qing dynasties
| 观察项目Items | 性别Sex | 年龄Age | 是否缠足Footbinding | 身高Stature | 体质量Body mass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | |||||
| 肱骨粗壮指数Caliber index of the humerus | 0.928 | 0.021 | -0.067 | 0.523 | 1.998 | 0.185 | -0.007 | 0.437 | 0.000 | 0.253 | ||||
| 肱骨骨干断面指数Shaft index of the humerus | 2.255 | 0.148 | 2.591 | 0.102 | -2.940 | 0.136 | 0.016 | 0.638 | 0.000 | 0.429 | ||||
| 股骨粗壮指数Robusticity index of the femur | 0.169 | 0.023 | -0.351 | 0.369 | 0.459 | 0.263 | -0.005 | 0.202 | 0.000 | 0.168 | ||||
| 股骨嵴指数Pilastric index of the femur | 15.281 | 0.000 | 3.707 | 0.859 | 10.299 | 0.024 | 0.045 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.625 | ||||
| 扁平指数Platycnemic index of the femur | 2.999 | 0.005 | -0.245 | 0.810 | 2.026 | 0.924 | -0.002 | 0.918 | 0.000 | 0.970 | ||||
| 胫骨中部断面指数Midshaft index of the tibia | -3.057 | 0.140 | -3.002 | 0.152 | -5.084 | 0.462 | 0.048 | 0.137 | 0.000 | 0.300 | ||||
| 性别Sex | 组别Group | 肩Shoulder | 肘Elbow | 前臂Forearm | 髋Hip | 膝Knee | 足Foot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男性Male | 温池明清组 | 2.56 | 2.51 | 2.73 | 2.23 | 2.48 | 2.82 |
| 淄博东周组* | 1.59 | 1.53 | 1.36 | 1.84 | 1.36 | 1.41 | |
| 淄博汉代组* | 1.49 | 1.34 | 0.96 | 1.43 | 1.17 | 1.64 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 1.82 | 1.76 | 1.61 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 2.07 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 2.78 | 2.54 | 2.00 | 2.43 | 2.66 | 2.94 | |
| 女性Female | 温池明清组 | 1.48 | 2.06 | 2.23 | 1.91 | 1.59 | 1.39 |
| 温池缠足女性 | 2.27 | 2.00 | 2.19 | 1.88 | 1.47 | 1.39 | |
| 温池未缠足女性 | 2.53 | 2.40 | 2.47 | 2.15 | 1.83 | 1.31 | |
| 淄博东周组* | 1.20 | 1.02 | 0.75 | 1.33 | 0.66 | 1.13 | |
| 淄博汉代组* | 1.53 | 1.36 | 0.84 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.16 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 1.78 | 1.64 | 1.32 | 1.76 | 1.41 | 1.94 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 2.36 | 1.53 | 0.96 | 1.69 | 0.74 | 1.68 |
表5 各古代居民组功能复合体发育程度统计表
Tab.5 Statistics for functional complex of ancient populations
| 性别Sex | 组别Group | 肩Shoulder | 肘Elbow | 前臂Forearm | 髋Hip | 膝Knee | 足Foot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男性Male | 温池明清组 | 2.56 | 2.51 | 2.73 | 2.23 | 2.48 | 2.82 |
| 淄博东周组* | 1.59 | 1.53 | 1.36 | 1.84 | 1.36 | 1.41 | |
| 淄博汉代组* | 1.49 | 1.34 | 0.96 | 1.43 | 1.17 | 1.64 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 1.82 | 1.76 | 1.61 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 2.07 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 2.78 | 2.54 | 2.00 | 2.43 | 2.66 | 2.94 | |
| 女性Female | 温池明清组 | 1.48 | 2.06 | 2.23 | 1.91 | 1.59 | 1.39 |
| 温池缠足女性 | 2.27 | 2.00 | 2.19 | 1.88 | 1.47 | 1.39 | |
| 温池未缠足女性 | 2.53 | 2.40 | 2.47 | 2.15 | 1.83 | 1.31 | |
| 淄博东周组* | 1.20 | 1.02 | 0.75 | 1.33 | 0.66 | 1.13 | |
| 淄博汉代组* | 1.53 | 1.36 | 0.84 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.16 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 1.78 | 1.64 | 1.32 | 1.76 | 1.41 | 1.94 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 2.36 | 1.53 | 0.96 | 1.69 | 0.74 | 1.68 |
| 性别Sex | 指数 Index→ 组别Group↓ | 肱骨粗壮Caliber of humerus | 肱骨骨干断面Shaft of humerus | 股骨粗壮Robusticity of femur | 股骨嵴Pilastric of femur | 扁平Platycnemic of femur | 胫骨中部断面Midshaft of tibia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男性Male | 温池明清组 | 21.15 | 77.16 | 13.09 | 107.72 | 78.79 | 72.92 |
| 土城子组 | 21.92 | - | 13.14 | 105.80 | 77.88 | 72.60 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 21.49 | 78.5 | 13.03 | 104.82 | 81.40 | 73.61 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 20.77 | 76.55 | 13.18 | 107.32 | 73.72 | 74.10 | |
| 女性Female | 温池明清组 | 20.39 | 74.47 | 12.54 | 93.55 | 75.25 | 74.36 |
| 温池缠足 | 20.00 | 74.16 | 12.17 | 87.09 | 75.24 | 74.17 | |
| 温池未缠足 | 20.44 | 76.38 | 13.58 | 94.40 | 75.36 | 76.05 | |
| 土城子组 | 20.97 | - | 12.67 | 102.92 | 75.42 | 74.30 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 21.52 | 78.23 | 12.70 | 101.52 | 76.08 | 76.40 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 18.84 | 79.05 | 12.11 | 105.08 | 77.83 | 75.40 |
表6 各古代居民组肢骨指数统计表
Tab.6 Statistics for limb diaphyseal shape of ancient populations
| 性别Sex | 指数 Index→ 组别Group↓ | 肱骨粗壮Caliber of humerus | 肱骨骨干断面Shaft of humerus | 股骨粗壮Robusticity of femur | 股骨嵴Pilastric of femur | 扁平Platycnemic of femur | 胫骨中部断面Midshaft of tibia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 男性Male | 温池明清组 | 21.15 | 77.16 | 13.09 | 107.72 | 78.79 | 72.92 |
| 土城子组 | 21.92 | - | 13.14 | 105.80 | 77.88 | 72.60 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 21.49 | 78.5 | 13.03 | 104.82 | 81.40 | 73.61 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 20.77 | 76.55 | 13.18 | 107.32 | 73.72 | 74.10 | |
| 女性Female | 温池明清组 | 20.39 | 74.47 | 12.54 | 93.55 | 75.25 | 74.36 |
| 温池缠足 | 20.00 | 74.16 | 12.17 | 87.09 | 75.24 | 74.17 | |
| 温池未缠足 | 20.44 | 76.38 | 13.58 | 94.40 | 75.36 | 76.05 | |
| 土城子组 | 20.97 | - | 12.67 | 102.92 | 75.42 | 74.30 | |
| 杨家寨汉晋组 | 21.52 | 78.23 | 12.70 | 101.52 | 76.08 | 76.40 | |
| 东山头汉书二期组 | 18.84 | 79.05 | 12.11 | 105.08 | 77.83 | 75.40 |
| [1] | 王尚义. 晋商商贸活动扩展的历史地理研究[D].博士学位论文, 北京: 北京大学, 2002 |
| [2] | 曹华. 集聚经济与清代山西商业城镇发展研究[D].硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西财经大学, 2019 |
| [3] | 李善靖, 王璋, 张涛. 明清盂县商人与地方社会[J]. 地方文化研究, 2018, 3: 42-50 |
| [4] | 原海兵, 李法军, 张敬雷, 等. 天津蓟县桃花园明清家族墓地人骨的身高推算(I)[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(4): 318-324 |
| [5] | 李法军, 盛立双. 有关古人骨年龄鉴定的问题:以天津蓟县明清时期敦典夫妇合葬墓和桃花园墓地为例[J]. 文物春秋, 2011(3): 24-27+42 |
| [6] | 周蜜, 田桂萍. 湖北郧县李泰家族墓群马檀山墓地明清时期人骨研究[J]. 江汉考古, 2015(6): 95-105 |
| [7] | 朱泓, 侯侃, 王晓毅. 从生物考古学角度看山西榆次明清时期平民的两性差异[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2017, 57(4): 117-124+206 |
| [8] | 陈博宇. 广州市执信中学墓地明清时期人骨研究[J]. 文博学刊, 2021(4): 4-20 |
| [9] | 孙晓璠, 张全超, 牟萍媛, 等. 山西洪洞西冯堡清代墓地缠足女性的骨骼损伤和关节疾病[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(2): 201-213 |
| [10] | Jurmain R, Cardoso FA, Henderson C. et al. Bioarchaeology’s Holy Grail:the reconstruction of activity[A]. In: Grauer AL(Eds.). A Companion to Paleopathology[C]. Malden: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, 531-552 |
| [11] |
Hawkey DE, Merbs CF. Activity-induced musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM) and subsistence strategy changes among ancient Hudson Bay Eskimos[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 1995, 5(4): 324-338
doi: 10.1002/oa.v5:4 URL |
| [12] |
Molnar P. Tracing prehistoric activities: musculoskeletal stress marker analysis of a stone-age population on the Island of Gotland in the Baltic sea[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2006, 129(1): 12-23
pmid: 16161142 |
| [13] |
Villotte S, Knüsel CJ. Understanding entheseal changes: definition and life course changes[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2013, 23(2): 135-146
doi: 10.1002/oa.v23.2 URL |
| [14] |
Refai O. Entheseal changes in ancient Egyptians from the pyramid builders of Giza—Old Kingdom[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2019, 29(4): 513-524
doi: 10.1002/oa.v29.4 URL |
| [15] |
Ruff C, Holt B, Trinkaus E. Who’s afraid of the big bad Wolff? “Wolff’s law” and bone functional adaptation[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2006, 129(4): 484-498
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.v129:4 URL |
| [16] |
Ruff C. Sexual dimorphism in human lower limb bone structure: relationship to subsistence strategy and sexual division of labor[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1987, 16(5): 391-416
doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90069-8 URL |
| [17] |
Feik SA, Thomas CD, Bruns R, et al. Regional variations in cortical modeling in the femoral mid-shaft: Sex and age differences[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2000, 112(2): 191-205
pmid: 10813702 |
| [18] | Jurmain R. Stories from the skeleton: behavioral reconstruction in human osteology[M]. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1999 |
| [19] |
Riggs BL, Melton LJ, Robb RA, et al. A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men[J]. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2008, 23(2): 205-214
doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071020 pmid: 17937534 |
| [20] |
Benjamin M, McGonagle D. The anatomical basis for disease localisation in seronegative spondyloarthropathy at entheses and related sites[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 2001, 199(5): 503-526
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19950503.x URL |
| [21] |
Perréard Lopreno G, Alves Cardoso F, Assis S, et al. Categorization of occupation in documented skeletal collections: its relevance for the interpretation of activity-related osseous changes[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2013, 23(2): 175-185
doi: 10.1002/oa.v23.2 URL |
| [22] |
Michopoulou E, Nikita E, Henderson CY. A test of the effectiveness of the Coimbra method in capturing activity-induced entheseal changes[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2017, 27(3): 409-417
doi: 10.1002/oa.v27.3 URL |
| [23] |
Henderson CY, Mariotti V, Pany-Kucera D, et al. The new ‘Coimbra Method’: A biologically appropriate method for recording specific features of fibrocartilaginous entheseal changes[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2016, 26(5): 925-932
doi: 10.1002/oa.v26.5 URL |
| [24] |
Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG. The study of entheses: proposal of a standardised scoring method for twenty-three entheses of the postcranial skeleton[J]. Collegium Antropologicum, 2007, 31(1): 291-313
pmid: 17598416 |
| [25] |
Jorgensen KC, Mallon L, Kranioti EF. Testing interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the original and revised Coimbra Methods[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2020, 30(6): 769-777
doi: 10.1002/oa.v30.6 URL |
| [26] | Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG. Enthesopathies-proposal of a standardized scoring method and applications[J]. Collegium Antropologicum, 2004, 28(1): 145-159 |
| [27] |
Milella M, Belcastro MG, Zollikofer CPE, et al. The effect of age, sex, and physical activity on entheseal morphology in a contemporary Italian skeletal collection[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2012, 148(3): 379-388
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22060 pmid: 22460619 |
| [28] | Zou RQ, Xing HY, Sun XF, et al. Patterns of entheseal changes and other activity markers in an ancient population from Neolithic to Bronze Age (8000-2300 BP) at the Houtaomuga site, Northeast China with special references to climate changes, subsistence strategies, sex-based labor divisions, and regional variations[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2024, 34(5): e3335 |
| [29] | 邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1985 |
| [30] |
Weiss E. Understanding muscle markers: lower limbs[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2004, 125(3): 232-238
pmid: 15386252 |
| [31] |
Henderson CY, Nikita E. Accounting for multiple effects and the problem of small sample sizes in osteology: a case study focussing on entheseal changes[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2016, 8(4): 805-817
doi: 10.1007/s12520-015-0256-1 URL |
| [32] |
Pearson OM. activity, climate, and postcranial robusticity : implications for modern human origins and scenarios of adaptive change[J]. Current Anthropology, 2000, 41(4): 569-607
pmid: 11624671 |
| [33] | 唐纳德·A·诺伊曼. 骨骼肌肉功能解剖学(第2版)[M].译者:刘颖,师玉涛,闫琪. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2014 |
| [34] |
Sołtysiak A. Early urbanization and mobility at Tell Brak, NE Syria: the evidence from femoral and tibial external shaft shape[J]. HOMO, 2015, 66(2): 101-117
doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2014.09.003 pmid: 25511782 |
| [35] |
Yonemoto S. Differences in the effects of age on the development of entheseal changes among historical Japanese populations[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2016, 159(2): 267-283
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22870 pmid: 26408231 |
| [36] |
Niinimäki S. What do muscle marker ruggedness scores actually tell us?[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2011, 21(3): 292-299
doi: 10.1002/oa.v21.3 URL |
| [37] |
Greenhalgh S. de-Orientalizing the Chinese family firm[J]. American Ethnologist, 1994, 21(4): 746-775
doi: 10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a00050 URL |
| [38] | 高国帅. 青海大通杨家寨墓地汉晋人骨研究[D].博士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2024 |
| [39] | 邹睿奇. 吉林大安东山头汉书二期文化人骨研究[D].硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2024 |
| [40] | 顾玉才. 内蒙古和林格尔县土城子遗址战国时期人骨研究[D].博士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2007 |
| [41] | Baldoni M, Scorrano G, Gismondi A, et al. Who were the miners of Allumiere? A multidisciplinary approach to reconstruct the osteobiography of an Italian worker community[J]. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(10): e0205362 |
| [42] |
Greenhalgh S. Bound feet, hobbled lives: women in old China[J]. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 1977, 2(1): 7-21
doi: 10.2307/3346103 URL |
| [43] | 许檀. 明清时期区域经济的发展——江南、华北等若干区域的比较[J]. 中国经济史研究, 1999(2): 21-39 |
| [1] | 杜雨薇, 耿帅杰, 徐静玥, 叶芷, 张乐, 马东东, 裴树文. 泥河湾盆地蔡家沟遗址A和B地点动物骨骼的埋藏学观察[J]. 人类学学报, 2026, 45(03): 570-585. |
| [2] | 廖汝雪, 傅裕, 王腾飞, 赵雄伟, 张潜, 陈彦伊, 陈少坤, 韩非, 吴雁, 胡鑫, 牛文渊, 韦璇, 黄先锋, 黄万波, 李英华. 重庆巫山龙骨坡遗址2023年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2026, 45(02): 345-357. |
| [3] | 刘武, 何嘉宁, 吴秀杰. 中国更新世人类头骨梨状孔区域的形态变异[J]. 人类学学报, 2026, 45(01): 18-33. |
| [4] | 邓婉文, 刘锁强. 石器的陡向加工技术与华南中至晚更新世人群的适应及扩散[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(06): 1060-1071. |
| [5] | 杜瑞妍, 吉学平, 周振宇, 关莹, 张茂林, 周晓燕, 邢松. 云南马鹿洞和塘子沟遗址古人类牙齿残留物中的淀粉粒[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(06): 1072-1082. |
| [6] | 金泽田, 吴秀杰, 邓国栋, 刘武. 华龙洞人6号头骨的面貌复原及其形态特点[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 754-764. |
| [7] | 江左其杲, 刘博轩, 刘驷统, 贺乐天, 同号文. 华龙洞1号地点的食肉目哺乳动物化石及其时代和古生态意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(05): 836-849. |
| [8] | 惠家明. 颅骨板障静脉的三维复原及其在人类演化中的意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(04): 545-555. |
| [9] | Robin DENNELL. 旧石器时代古人类和智人在东亚的扩散[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(01): 132-164. |
| [10] | 关莹, 王社江, 周振宇, 高星, 张茜. 洛南手斧上的淀粉粒与古人类使用石器的策略[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(06): 1064-1074. |
| [11] | 魏偏偏, 赵昱浩. 东亚地区更新世古人类股骨的演化[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(06): 993-1005. |
| [12] | 刘驷统, 顾万发, 吴倩, 周亚威. 河南双槐树遗址人群肱骨肌腱的起止点形变[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(05): 757-766. |
| [13] | 倪喜军. 人类起源研究中的哲学问题[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(06): 709-720. |
| [14] | 杜雨薇, 丁馨, 裴树文. 浅议古人类活动遗址的动物埋藏学研究方法[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(03): 523-534. |
| [15] | 关莹, 周振宇. 数据科学在旧石器考古学中的应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(01): 169-179. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
京ICP证05002819号-3